<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing package versions in PostgreSQL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.labix.org/2006/07/30/comparing-package-versions-in-postgresql/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.labix.org/2006/07/30/comparing-package-versions-in-postgresql</link>
	<description>by Gustavo Niemeyer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:12:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Conway</title>
		<link>http://blog.labix.org/2006/07/30/comparing-package-versions-in-postgresql/comment-page-1#comment-1957</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Conway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 04:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labix.org/2006/07/30/comparing-package-versions-in-postgresql/#comment-1957</guid>
		<description>You could consider writing the trigger function in C, rather than PL/PgSQL. I wouldn&#039;t think the function call overhead for PL/PgSQL should be too high, but it should be even lower for C UDFs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could consider writing the trigger function in C, rather than PL/PgSQL. I wouldn&#8217;t think the function call overhead for PL/PgSQL should be too high, but it should be even lower for C UDFs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

